Technology Planning WorkshopFor this session, we want to look at and discuss the various pieces and possibilities that are involved in going through a technology planning process, paying particular attention to aspects of defining the criteria that might be involved in doing this. I've given you a completely massive list, I know. Relax! There are a number of models to look at -- some more pertinent to the arts than others. You'll note that there are a huge number of educational resources, as this is a completely critical issue for schools and school systems. Don't feel that you have to look at all of them, but do spend some time exploring -- you'll find that most of them are fairly short. The only one I know of that's really arts specific is the last one in the first section, which is part of the Arts Wire Technology Planning workshop that I've developed. Please do these three things in preparation for class: 1. Take a look at the links below that discuss planning criteria, and think about which pieces make sense to you for an arts organization. Which of these sites and materials do you find valuable? Which not so valuable? (Feel free, if you wish, to go out on the internet and look for more examples -- I'm always looking to find new examples.) There are several pieces in here which discuss general issues, such as upgrading, or what having a good computer can do for you. These are for general background, and also to help you think about this quesion: what does having good technology have to do with your organizational mission? 2. Take a look at the inventory worksheets and other related material, and think about how these relate to what you're doing. How clear or unclear are they to you? I'll bring to class a couple of examples (which are variations on the OneNorthwest ones) for the arts. 3. Finally, write up your own planning criteria, and be prepared to discuss it in class. What should an agency be thinking about and why? How does all this relate to mission? Also, remember that you are to be defining which organization you're going to use for your site visit. Feel free to explore more of these sites if you wish -- there are some very nice things here -- but be aware of the main mission for this class, lest you get lost! Many of these sites contain other pieces we'll be looking at later, as you'll see. Here are criteria received from class members...
Planning criteria and overview links: North Central Regional Technology in Education Consortium SolutionSource (a short example of some questions from a commercial perspective.) Information Technology Research National Computational Science Alliance Bellevue Community College EDmin Open Systems Western School Board (Canada) Information Systems of Florida (a consulting firm) John See Sylvia Bodolay ARCH National Resource Center for Crisis Nurseries and Respite Care Services National School Services Education Technology Planners The Eastern New Jersey Regional Library Cooperative Williamsburg Middle School From Now On (The Educational Technology Journal) Rockefeller Technology Project (Circuit Rider's Section) Nonprofit Tech National Center for Technology Planning The Internet Non-Profit Center Coyote Communications Tech News: Enhancing Human Services through Technology Arts Wire Technology Planning Workshop Assessment links and resources: Nonprofit Tech OneNorthwest (top) Yamilett Abejon
Implementation - How will the technology become available to employees, and various audiences of the organization. How "user friendly" will technology be.Will there be regularly scheduled classes to train, introduce, improve, and develop individual technology.
(top) Melissa Azzi Technology Plan Criteria: Support By support I do not mean simply technical support by rather employee support. Everyone in the organization must buy into and support the idea of using the system of technology established within the organization. Furthermore, those staff members who are not comfortable with the technology must be supported with knowledge and assistance if they are expected to support the system. Availability Everyone must have access to a computer and an internet account. Ideally this means one computer and internet account per person. At the very least, it means one computer and internet account per department. Connectedness The technology system must serve to increase the
level of connectedness, communication, and collaboration between people
and departments. Lack of communication and infighting are major hindrances
in the success of exhibitions and educational programs. Furthermore, increased
communication increases inter-employee understanding and sympathy and
gives individual staff members a more holistic perception of the organiztion. Learning The system of technology must be a learning process. Beyond the formal training provided, the staff must continue to explore and learn through the system. Not only must the system enhance staff learning through technology, it must also enhance audience learning in connection with the collection. Accessible The technology system must increase accessibility to the institution and the individuals within it. Furthermore, the system must be accessible to the audience and must serve to make the organization and collection more accessible to the public. Out/inreach The technology system must increase the organizations outreach and also change the nature of outreach to inreach. Establishing two-way communication with audiences through technology, while reaching new areas and people, needs to be encompassed by the technology system. Renewal By this I do not simply mean the renewal of the physical elements of the technology system, such as the hardware and software (although this is important). I mean that the website must be consistently renewed. The technology available to the public must be renewed. (Children absorb technology at an extremely fast rate. This means what you provide for them cannot remain static for too long or they are going to lose interest). Finally the system itself must be renewed. Portable The technology system must have an element of portablity. In other words, staff should be able to use the system regardless of their location within or outside of the institution. Depreciation Depreciation needs to be considered and accounted for when establishing a technology system. Melinda Block
Criteria for Arts Organization Technology Plan The Following criteria are established to help create a technology plan for 1926 The Exhibition Studies Center. So far, the gallery has limited capacities, and since we are a new gallery belonging to SAIC, there are a number of technology compatibility's that we share with the school community. 1. Increasing Productivity: 1926 would benefit from a plan for several reasons: to increase our options for communication with SAIC as well as individuals; and to potentially increase our productivity. 2. Improving Capacity: Our capacity to serve the school and the students will be enhanced with an improved technology plan. 1926 exists in 2 "spaces" as an off-campus school institution, and as a physical space on N. Halsted Street. Our relationship both to the school community and to N. Halsted (Lincoln Park) community need to be better defined. Making better use of technology will allow for improved relationships with both communities. 3. Problem Solving: SAIC provided us with a computer, but does not really think they should assist us in any other way since we are "way off campus". Should we have any technical computer problems, we are left to our own devices. This goes for the phones, fax and internet. We need to be trained in how to effectively troubleshoot technical problems, and have resources available should we need assistance. 4. Improving Visibility 1926 needs to improve its presence and visibility at SAIC. Improved technology at the gallery will hopefully help us reach this goal. Options need to be explored for our "virtual" relationship with the school. 1926 can and should make use of the SAIC web site, or start our own. This will allow the gallery to not only improve it's visibility in the universe of virtual art spaces, but allow for greater creativity and present increased options for gallery activities and exhibitions. Sybille Canthal
Technology I. II. III. IV. (top) Krissy Davis Criteria for Quality Technology Education Education for the employees on the technology on which
the organization functions is perhaps the most important criteria. If
the employees are not aware or not knowledgeable on the technology that
the organization has available to them, it is as good as not having that
technology period. A few hours of training could save hours of work time
per day for each employee if they are taught how to effectively use their
equipment. Possibility for Leaving room for the possibility of upgrading
the technology is Improvement important. Since technology changes so fast,
it is necessary to able to move along with the wave of the future. Flexibility Technology cannot be so specific that it can only
serve one task for one or two people. Equipment that is available or useable
by everyone in the organization is important for efficiency. Efficiency The technology must be able to facilitate and lessen
the workload of the employee. If something is more trouble than it is
worth, it is not efficient. Consistency This is probably the least important criteria as
most arts organizations are small and far from wealthy, so many cannot
afford to have all their employees integrated on the same system or on
the same types and models of computers. Yet, this is a desirable thing. Quality The organization must get the most bang for its buck.
This point ties into the notion of research which is the next category. Assessment Doing research into what the organization really needs
(verses wants) involves asking its employees. Making a list of these things
in a manner which ranks their importance is a good way of flushing out
the wants verses the needs and it also gets the whole organization involved. Evaluation An evaluation of the system, once it is in place, is necessary every so often to accurately determine its success and to stay informed on what the current needs or problems are in terms of technology in the organization. (top) Seminar Assignment
Course: Rewiring the Arts Organization The School of the Arts Institute Anja Deller, February 16th, 1999 CRITERIA FOR TECHNOLOGY PLANNING
Build and maintain technology inter-office standard Don't get wasted Share knowledge and experiences (technology team approach) Stay connected Reduce hierarchies through communication Locate and name two experts for crisis management Be alert and stay safe Maintain good health Geoffrey Fleming CRITERIA
2. EASY TO USE Should not be hard to use, It should take a limited amount of time to learn the basics. 3. INEXPENSIVE Should be available, at least in theory, to all that require it. You should not have to mortgage one portion of your organization to finance the other. 4. ORGANIZED Not haphazardly created but planned carefully, and where possible, with the aid of a professional. 5. CONVENIENT Not one computer for all, but at the very least one computer for a few. It is hard to learn when you dont get a chance to use the equipment. 6. ACCESSIBLE Should be able to access information from outside of the organization with relative ease, such as email. 7. FUNCTIONAL The different parts should work together if possible, computers with the digital copier, etc . . . 8. UPGRADABLE Not only the computers, but the phone systems and copier capabilities as well. 9. INTEGRATED Not only into your programming but your instruments as well, phones to computers, computers to copiers, etc. . .
Partnership: Make sure that communicative tools enhance partnerships externally and internally. Access: Utilize communicative tools so that outside customers may obtain the optimal service available. Assess: Continually assess communicative tools internally and externally. Address disconnected forces in communication. Collaborate: Utilization of optimal communicative tools involves the collaborative initiative of all those involved with the organization. Question: Always question what the organization is doing. What can be preformed more efficiently? How? In what manner? Prioritize: What should/can be accomplished long term-short term? Mission: How is the mission of the organization being supported through communicative tools? How can it be pronounced more clearly? (top) Traci A. Hortinela
Rewiring Arts Organizations February 17, 1999 CRITIERA FOR TECHNOLOGY PLAN Accessible and Functional. Technology is available and useful to staff for optimal job performance. Consensus. Staff and Board work together to realize the impact of technology in their work environment and to agree that technology can enhance their job performance with the understanding that the human element of nonprofits is essential to its existence. Planning. Key staff (from each department) and Board assess the current technology and needs and design options of how they will address those needs (ex: hire a technology consultant or volunteer who has the skills, desire and time). An ample amount of time should be allowed to implement the action plan and to adjust to the changing work environment. Evaluation. Ongoing assessment of the technology in terms of its functionality, and relationship to changes in the nature of organizational work and growth. Maintenance. Support staff maintain and adapt technological systems as well as focus on troubleshooting technological matters for individual staff. Development and Training. Keep abreast of new and improved technologies that will better serve the organization. Continual education and training for all levels is crucial. Resources. Financial resources be allotted for maintenance, acquisition, research and training. Holistic. Technological systems are compatible and work together to serve the organization to fulfill its mission and goals. (top) Rewiring the Arts Organization
Sandra Jaggi February 10, 1999 Technology Planning Criteria
Have a phone system which is powerful and flexible. Have an on-site server. Strong investment in end-user hardware. Keep it Simpleprovide access to only the necessary hardware and software within departments. In-house information services capable of support and training. (top) SAIC Homework
Technological Vision for a Children's Art Organization Comprehensive Technology Plan Teachers Vision Participation Evaluation (top) Joy Qi Le
Criteria for the Technology Plan ( for the Chicago Filmmakers )
Training and Support Every employee should be trained to use the computer and software. The organization should be active in upgrading the technology and using its support. Outreach The technology should allow the organization to communicate with its audience and make the organization accessible to the general public. Convenient The technology should provide convenience for people who use the service provided by the organization. Tickets to the film screening should be able to be purchased through phone or on the web. Registration for classes and equipment rental should be made possible online. Collaborative Sharing of technology and information should be encouraged within the organization as well as with other similar art organizations, such as the Film Center. This ensures both organizations to serve the community better with the resource they have. (top) Sarah Nemerovski KNOWLEDGE UPGRADABLE THE INTERNET COLLABORATE WITH OTHER ORGANIZATIONS INPUT EVALUATION SYSTEM BUDGET (top) Mary Anne Redding Technology Planning Criteria As I think it more useful to develop criteria for an actual rather than virtual technology plan., and given that I've committed to incorporating into all class exercises "real" life situations that I am involved in or wish to explore, the criteria I am proposing will be based on a technology plan I hope both developing and implementing for the 2000: New Artists in Chicago exhibition. The 1998: New Artists in Chicago exhibition did not have a written technology plan. The project staff, primarily Sybille Canthal and Alison Cole, created a web site (with assistance from Joe), but beyond that we didn't really discuss technology outside of what would be needed both at the Terra Museum of American Art and at the Chicago Cultural Center to show the art work. I think if we had developed a technology plan both the video presentation at the museum and certainly the time-arts events at the Cultural Center would have gone more smoothly. If the initiative continues next spring with 2000: New Artists in Chicago I want to develop a technology plan that not only incorporate the presentation of the art work but will also be useful as a tool for the project staff and will expand the web site already in place. First, I want to expand the New Artists Project from a one semester project (roughly 4 months) to a full academic year (roughly 9 months). I realize that, typically, a technology plan covers a much longer time span, but the work of designing a plan for the 2000 project can be used in the future if the New Artists continues as we envision it might. Because the New Artists project is designed to promote emerging art in Chicago and also to develop new audiences for this art, the technology plan will have to incorporate several multidimensional aspects. I think the important questions to ask include: 1) How can technology best be used among the project staff, the convenors, and the Terra Museum and its staff to communicate internally as the project develops. How can we evaluate last year's project and re configure a more efficient implementation of staff time and resources? What worked well and what can be introduced to stream line the work? How will this effect the project budget? 2) How can technology best be utilized to communicate with the emerging artists; first to spread the word about the application process , especially how can technology be used to reach artists working outside of traditional academic structures? And, secondly, how can the project staff most efficiently facilitate connections with the artists chosen for inclusion in the show? 3) How can technology be used to develop new audiences. Here the expansion of the New Artist web site will be critical. Are there possible links with resources from members of the launch committee via the internet and other resources? It will be important both to use the web to provide information about project events, additionally, I would like to gather feedback on-line. What other technological resources will also accomplish this? (top) Technology Planning Criteria I have recently worked with the Chicago Community Center Coalition members on technology planning for a UIC/ATT technology-training grant. We held townhall meetings to discuss the biggest obstacles confronting office technology. Criteria that needs to be addressed when planning a successful technology attack in a small, poorly funded not-for-profit are: Input from all levels. Equipment Assessment.
Training.
|
|||||
|
|
|
||||